The Logical Framework Approach to Strategic Project Management


On November 1st, the Chicagoland Chapter of the Project Management Institute held the 3rd annual Project Development Day Event in Rolling Meadows, IL.    The title of the event was “Going beyond the Triple Constraints”, and there were 4 tracks of educational programming offered.    I was the track lead for track #3 covering stakeholder management, procurement, and risk management, and I was responsible for getting 7 speakers from a wide variety of application areas, including IT, manufacturing, construction, and transportation, as well as project management consulting firms that specialized in everything from Lean Six Sigma, public speaking/leadership principles, and strategic planning.    During the next week, I intend to give summaries of the presentations that were given at the PD Day Event.

1.  Speaker Bio

Terry Schmidt, MBA, PMP, SMP , Founder, ManagementPro.com www.ManagementPro.com
Terry Schmidt is an internationally known strategy expert and project management consultant who helps organizations become more purposeful, productive, and profitable. He has three decades of experience as an executive, educator, project coach, and strategist who has assisted corporations, governments, and research institutions in 36 countries worldwide. The author of seven management books, Terry earned his Aerospace Engineering BS from the University of Washington and his MBA from Harvard.
Mr. Schmidt is a Logical Framework pioneer and author of Strategic Project Management Made Simple: Practical Tools for Leaders and Teams (Wiley, 2009), the definitive book on applying the Logical Framework Approach. A dynamic keynote speaker and master seminar leader, he has taught nearly 25,000 professionals in executive programs at UCLA, MIT and elsewhere.
He is the fourth person in the world recognized as a Strategic Management Professional (SMP) by the Association for Strategic Planning.
2.  Presentation Summary
I am currently waiting for a copy of the presentation from the speaker so that I can put up a summary on this blog.   

Lean vs. Six Sigma: Two Sides of the Same Coin?


On November 1st, the Chicagoland Chapter of the Project Management Institute held the 3rd annual Project Development Day Event in Rolling Meadows, IL.    The title of the event was “Going beyond the Triple Constraints”, and there were 4 tracks of educational programming offered.    I was the track lead for track #3 covering stakeholder management, procurement, and risk management, and I was responsible for getting 7 speakers from a wide variety of application areas, including IT, manufacturing, construction, and transportation, as well as project management consulting firms that specialized in everything from Lean Six Sigma, public speaking/leadership principles, and strategic planning.    During the next week, I intend to give summaries of the presentations that were given at the PD Day Event.

1,  Speaker Bio

Brent Tadsen is a GE certified Master Black Belt and partner at Adaptive Business Solutions.  Before joining Adaptive, Brent was a top rated Lean and Six Sigma trainer.  Additionally, he was a member of the GE Corporate team which helped facilitate GE’s adoption of Lean thinking principles and integrate Lean thinking with the existing Six Sigma culture.

Brent’s Lean experience transverses numerous industries and business models. He holds a B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Notre Dame, and an MBA from Northwestern’s Kellogg School of Management.  Brent is a former U.S. Army Captain and is a GE certified Green Belt, Black Belt, and Master Black Belt.

He has presented at numerous national conferences including the IIE Annual Conference, IIE Operational Excellence Conference, Lean Six Sigma Summit, Business Process Management Conference, Railway Supply Institute Annual Conference, National Manufacturing Week, and Industry Week’s Annual Conference.  Brent is a dynamic and energetic speaker who is able to get audiences involved and excited.  His class and presentation feedback scores average 9.7 out of 10.  He is also a former member of the Lean Board of Directors at the  Institute of Industrial Engineers.

2,  Presentation Summary

I am waiting for the presentation slides from the author in order to make the summary available.

Stakeholder Management on the Illinois Tollway Project


On November 1st, the Chicagoland Chapter of the Project Management Institute held the 3rd annual Project Development Day Event in Rolling Meadows, IL.    The title of the event was “Going beyond the Triple Constraints”, and there were 4 tracks of educational programming offered.    I was the track lead for track #3 covering stakeholder management, procurement, and risk management, and I was responsible for getting 7 speakers from a wide variety of application areas, including IT, manufacturing, construction, and transportation, as well as project management consulting firms that specialized in everything from Lean Six Sigma, public speaking/leadership principles, and strategic planning.    During the next week, I intend to give summaries of the presentations that were given at the PD Day Event.

1.  Speaker Bio

Bob Skidmore’s experience traverses numerous industries and business models.  He holds a Bachelor of Science in civil engineering from Vanderbilt University and an MBA from DePaul’s Kellstadt School of Business.

Bob has successfully managed large projects in transportation, residential development and commercial development.  He has more than 15 years of experience in both horizontal and vertical construction in both public and private industry.

Some of his major accomplishments include the Fox River Bridge Environmental Impact Study, Kane County maintenance reorganization, Mill Creek subdivision construction, construction of multiple apartment and multi-use buildings.

Bob currently is Executive Project Manager for the Illinois Tollway and is serving as Deputy Program Manager for the Elgin O’Hare Western Access project.

2.  Presentation Summary

I am waiting for the slides to the presentation from Bob Skidmore so I can do a proper summary of the event.   Stay tuned!

Skills for Success: The Dale Carnegie Approach to Stakeholder Management


On November 1st, the Chicagoland Chapter of the Project Management Institute held the 3rd annual Project Development Day Event in Rolling Meadows, IL.    The title of the event was “Going beyond the Triple Constraints”, and there were 4 tracks of educational programming offered.    I was the track lead for track #3 covering stakeholder management, procurement, and risk management, and I was responsible for getting 7 speakers from a wide variety of application areas, including IT, manufacturing, construction, and transportation, as well as project management consulting firms that specialized in everything from Lean Six Sigma, public speaking/leadership principles, and strategic planning.    During the next week, I intend to give summaries of the presentations that were given at the PD Day Event.

1.  Speaker Bio

Mark is a Dale Carnegie Sr. Consultant for Chicagoland and NW Indiana. He works with area businesses and non–profits to deliver training that gets results. Leadership, communication, collaboration and sales are common focus areas when he works with clients.

Coaching both on-site corporate training and open enrollment public programs, Mark has trained project managers in manufacturing, IT, construction, healthcare, and quality. He has spoken to corporate meetings, business associations, non–profits, veteran’s groups, and universities. A member of the Dale Carnegie–Chicago Team for over 25 years, he has a degree in Applied Behavioral Science and Management and is certified to instruct a range of Dale Carnegie Training programs.

2.  Presentation Summary

A project manager’s effectiveness in this area will support or undermine many of the other critical elements from Planning to Risk Management. Strengthening the ability to initiate and maintain productive relationships with all stakeholders is essential to success.

This is a placeholder until I get the materials from Mark Wilson to complete the post.

 

The UL Approach to Risk & Stakeholder Management


On November 1st, the Chicagoland Chapter of the Project Management Institute held the 3rd annual Project Development Day Event in Rolling Meadows, IL.    The title of the event was “Going beyond the Triple Constraints”, and there were 4 tracks of educational programming offered.    I was the track lead for track #3 covering stakeholder management, procurement, and risk management, and I was responsible for getting 7 speakers from a wide variety of application areas, including IT, manufacturing, construction, and transportation, as well as project management consulting firms that specialized in everything from Lean Six Sigma, public speaking/leadership principles, and strategic planning.    During the next week, I intend to give summaries of the presentations that were given at the PD Day Event.

1.   Speaker Bio

Rafael Matuk (rafael.matuk@outlook.com) has more than 20 years of experience in most aspects of IT strategy, applications, delivery and operations.

A successful IT Executive, Rafael has a proven track record delivering and supporting IT projects and solutions in complex, multinational and multicultural environments. He has broad experience in Supply Chain, Manufacturing, IT strategy, Quality and Operations Management, Enterprise Resource Planning, Outsourcing and Strategic Business Transformation. Rafael is fluent in English and Spanish.

2.  Presentation Summary

I am waiting for a copy of the presentation slides so I can add some details to my notes–the entire post should be up in the next day or so.

Rafael spends his free time with his wife and three daughters, enjoys photography and profuse reading.

Multisourcing: Moving Beyond Outsourcing


On November 1st, the Chicagoland Chapter of the Project Management Institute held the 3rd annual Project Development Day Event in Rolling Meadows, IL.    The title of the event was “Going beyond the Triple Constraints”, and there were 4 tracks of educational programming offered.    I was the track lead for track #3 covering stakeholder management, procurement, and risk management, and I was responsible for getting 7 speakers from a wide variety of application areas, including IT, manufacturing, construction, and transportation, as well as project management consulting firms that specialized in everything from Lean Six Sigma, public speaking/leadership principles, and strategic planning.    During the next week, I intend to give summaries of the presentations that were given at the PD Day Event.

1.   Speaker Bio

The first presentation was given by George Wang.   He is a certified PMP since 2004 and has held senior roles in both technology and business sides, working at its intersection as a technology strategist, innovator and translator. Having worked in wireless telecomm, insurance, financial services, healthcare and education, his journey through multiple industries has given him a broad perspective of the common as well as unique business challenges in enabling technology transformation and innovation.

George recently led the Electronic Medical Records (EMR) training effort for a large enterprise-wide EMR implementation for the second largest hospital system in the Chicagoland area and is currently Technical Director, New Business Development at Stericycle, a market leader whose vision is “To help our customers fulfill their promise by providing solutions that protect people and brands, promote health and safeguard the environment”. He is the PMI Chicago Executive Council Co-Chair.

2.  Presentation Summary

Strategic selection of resourcing is crucial for the success of a project. The various models of resourcing will be presented (insourcing, outsourcing, hybrid) and a discussion will be presented on what are the best circumstances in which to use each of these models.

If you are going to use outsourcing, either alone or with insourcing, then it is important to:

  • use best practices,
  • secure the appropriate measures of success
  • in your contractual agreements through engagement
  • use proper communication management among team
  • members, business and senior stakeholders
  • be aware of time zone challenges

This post will be finished tomorrow after I receive a copy of the presentation to clarify some of the details.

PMI-Chicagoland 3rd Annual Professional Development Day Event


Today I attended the 3rd Annual Professional Development Day Event put on by the Chicagoland chapter of the Project Management Institute.

The title of the event was “Beyond the Triple Constraints”, and I was the made the track lead for Track #3 of the educational programming.    This consisted of three types of constraints that project managers have to be increasingly aware of beyond the traditional triple constraints of time, cost, and scope, namely:   stakeholders, risk, and procurement.

I just got home from the event, so I am putting in a placeholder post on my blog so that I can write a little bit about each of the 7 presentations tomorrow, after I decompress and absorb a little bit of the information I learned today.

 

5th Edition PMBOK® Guide–Step 6: Memorizing Inputs & Outputs (Scope Management Part 1)


1. Introduction

In this next series of posts on memorizing the processes, we move on to the final step 6, which is memorizing the INPUTS & OUTPUTS associated with each of the 47 processes.   In order to breakdown the memorization into more bite-size chunks, I am breaking down the processes in the 10 knowledge areas into 2 or 3 posts each.

This post covers chapter 5 of the PMBOK® Guide, which covers the Scope Knowledge Area. This knowledge area contains 6 processes,

2.   Summary of Processes, Tools & Techniques, and Inputs & Outputs for processes 5.1 and 5.2

There are a total of six processes in the Scope Knowledge Area.   Because of the large number of inputs and outputs, I am splitting my discussion of the inputs and outputs into three different posts, each one of which will cover two of the processes.    In that way, I can describe the inputs and outputs for these processes in a little bit of detail without the post becoming too long.

Here is a chart which shows the first two processes, 5.1 Plan Scope Management and 5.2 Collect Requirements, together with their tools & techniques (which are discussed in a previous post) and their inputs & outputs.   NOTE:  the generic inputs known as Environmental Enterprise Factors and Operational Process Assets are given by their acronyms EEFs and OPAs, respectively.

Process Name Tools & Techniques Inputs Outputs
5.1 Plan Scope Management 1. Expert Judgment

2. Meetings

1. Project management plan

2. Project charter

3. EEFs

4. OPAs

1. Scope management plan

2. Requirements management plan

5.2 Collect Requirements 1. Interviews

2. Focus groups

3. Facilitated workshops

4. Group creativity techniques

5. Group decision-making techniques

6. Questionnaires and surveys

7. Observations

8. Prototypes

9. Context diagrams

10. Document analysis

1. Scope management plan

2. Requirements management plan

3. Stakeholder management plan

4. Project charter

5. Stakeholder register

 

1. Requirements documentation

2. Requirements traceability matrix

You will notice that this is one of the rarer instances where the list of tools & techniques for one of the processes, namely 5.2 Collect Requirements, is longer than the list of inputs & outputs.   It’s because collecting the requirements is such an involved process, requiring access to all the stakeholders and then on top of that, needing a lot of technical analysis to take the initial set of requirements and to prioritize them.

3.  Outputs of process 5.1 and 5.2

Let’s discuss the outputs first because they are generally easier to identify than the inputs.

a.  Scope management plan (5.1 Plan Scope Management)

It should be fairly obvious that the primary output of the process “Plan Scope Management” will be the Scope Management Plan.

The scope management plan contains information on the following processes:

  • creation of the main elements of the scope baseline, the project scope statement and the work breakdown structure or WBS
  • the formal acceptance of the completed project deliverables will be obtained
  • the control of requests for changes to the detailed project scope statement

b.  Requirements management plan (5.1 Plan Scope Management)

What may not be so obvious is that one of the 4 subsidiary plans that make up the overall Project Management Plan, is also an output of this process in addition to the Scope Management Plan mentioned in paragraph a above. 

The requirements management plan contains information on the following processes:

  • requirements prioritization process
  • product metrics that will be used
  • requirement attributes that will be captured on the traceability matrix

c.  Requirements documentation (5.2 Collect Requirements)

This includes documentation on the various categories of requirements, such as

  • Business requirements
  • Stakeholder requirements
  • Solution requirements (technology and standard compliance, support and training, quality)
  • Project requirements
  • Requirements assumptions, dependencies, and constraints

d.  Requirements traceability matrix (5.2 Collect Requirements)

This grid links the product requirements to the deliverables that satisfy those requirements.   It helps ensure that the requirements listed in the requirements documentation (paragraph c) above actually are delivered at the end of the project.

These are the outputs of these two processes.

4.  Inputs of process 5.1 and 5.2

a. Project management plan (5.1 Plan Scope Management)

Okay, PMI says that “approved subsidiary plans of the project management plan are used to create the scope management plan.”  My comment to PMI is, “could you be a LITTLE more specific?”   This entry for the inputs of this process is singularly unhelpful, because here’s all of what is in the Project Management Plan, which is not really a single plan, but a collection of baselines (scope, schedule, and cost), subsidiary management plans from the other 9 knowledge areas, and 4 additional subsidiary management plans (change, configuration, requirements and process improvement).   PMI should have listed which particular subsidiary plans they have in mind.

b. Project charter (5.1 Plan Scope Management and 5.2 Collect Requirements)

This provides the high-level of the description of the project and lists the desired product characteristics from the project statement of work.   The project statement of work or SOW is the “seed” of the project.   To learn the difference between the project charter and the project SOW, refer to the following post:

https://4squareviews.com/2013/03/07/5th-edition-pmbok-guide-project-statement-of-work-vs-project-charter/

c.  EEFs (5.1 Plan Scope Management)

The EEFs used as inputs to this process are:

  • Organizational culture
  • Infrastructure
  • Personnel administration
  • Marketplace conditions

d.  OPAs (5.1 Plan Scope Management)

The OPAs used as inputs to this process are:

  • Policies and procedures
  • Historical information from previous projects and lessons learned database

e. Scope management plan (5.2 Collect Requirements)

This clarifies how the project teams will determine which types of requirements need to be collected for the project.

f.  Requirements management plan (5.2 Collect Requirements)

Provides the processes to be used throughout the Collect Requirements process to define and document stakeholder needs.

g.  Stakeholder management plan (5.2 Collect Requirements)

Helps understand stakeholder communication requirements and level of stakeholder engagement in order to adapt the level of stakeholder participation in requirements activities.

h.  Stakeholder register (5.2 C0llect Requirements)

Used to identify which stakeholders can give information on particular requirements.  It also captures the major requirements and main expectations stakeholders may have for the project.

These are the inputs to these two processes.   Do not try to actively memorize the list of inputs and outputs!  Rather, try to be able to passively recognize them if they occur in exam questions.    For example, take a sheet of paper with the name of each of the processes in the Scope Management knowledge area.   Take some index cards and write the names of the inputs and outputs.   Then shuffle the deck, and read the names of the inputs and outputs as they come up, and try to identify which of the processes you think it goes with, then use the PMBOK® Guide to check and see if you are right.   You’ll be surprised how many you get correct the first time, IF you have taken the trouble to understand what the process does and understand what some of the tools & techniques are.

The next post will cover the next two processes, 5.3 Define Scope and 5.4 Create WBS.

 

5th Edition PMBOK® Guide–Step 6: Memorizing Inputs & Outputs (Integration Management Part 3)


1. Introduction

In this next series of posts on memorizing the processes, we move on to the final step 6, which is memorizing the INPUTS & OUTPUTS associated with each of the 47 processes.   In order to breakdown the memorization into more bite-size chunks, I am breaking down the processes in the 10 knowledge areas into 2 or 3 posts each.

2.  Review of Processes, Tools & Techniques in Integration Knowledge Area

For a review of the following two processes and their tools & techniques, please see previous posts (look in the search function under “Chapter 4”).     As usual, the generic inputs EEFs stand for “Enterprise Environmental Factors” and OPAs stand for “Operational Process Assets.”

Process Name Tools & Techniques Inputs Outputs
4.5 Perform Integrated Change Control 1.  Expert judgment

2.  Meetings

3.  Change Control Tools

1.  Project management plan

2.  Work performance reports

3.  Change requests

4.  EEFs

5.  OPAs

1. Approved change requests

2. Change log

3. Project management plan updates

4. Project documents updates

4.6 Close Project or Phase 1.  Expert judgment

2.  Analytical techniques

3.  Meetings

1.  Project management plan

2. Accepted deliverables

3.  OPAs

1. Final product, service, or result transition

2. OPAs updates

3.  Outputs of Integration Knowledge Area processes 4.5 and 4.6

We will discuss the outputs of the processes first before the inputs.

a.  Approved change requests (4.5 Perform Integrated Change Control)

Since the purpose of the process is to take change requests, analyze them and then either approve or reject them, it should make sense that this is the most basic (and most important) of the outputs of the process.

b.  Change log (4.5 Perform Integrated Change Control)

What happens if the change is rejected instead of approved?    It gets captured in the change log, which lists the details of all proposed changes, and whether they are approved or rejected.  If they are rejected, the reason for the rejection is given.

c.  Project management plan updates (4.5 Perform Integrated Change Control)

The changes to the project may require the adjustment of other constraints.   Both the changes and the other adjustments made to accommodate them must be reflected in the performance baselines and the affected subsidiary plans that deal with those constraints.

d.  Project document updates (4.5 Perform Integrated Change Control)

All documents that are part of the formal change control process will be updated as the result of a change request.

e.  Final product, service, or result transition (4.6 Close Project or Phase)

The final product, service, or result is transferred from the organization that has done the project to either the customer or sponsor who requested it.

f.  OPAs

The OPAs that are updated as a result of the process 4.6 Close Project or Phase include:

  • Project files (project management plan, risk registers, change management documentation)
  • Project closure documents (customer acceptance documentation, financial closure documentation, etc.)
  • Historical information (lessons learned, etc.) to be used on future projects

4.  Inputs of Integration Knowledge processes 4.5 and 4.6

a.  Project management plan (4.5 Perform Integrated Change Control)

In particular, the parts of the project management plan that are used as inputs for the process 4.5 Perform Integrated Change Control are:

  • scope baseline (scope statement, WBS, and WBS dictionary)
  • scope management plan (includes procedures for scope changes)
  • change management plan (provides direction for managing the change control process and documents the format change control board or CCB)

The parts of the project management plan that are used as inputs for the process 4.6 Close Project or Phase are:

  • The agreement between the project manager and project sponsor on what constitutes successful project completion

b.  Work performance reports (4.5 Perform Integrated Change Control)

Earned value measurement reports and reports about resource availability.

c.  Change requests (4.5 Perform Integrated Change Control)

These are what are to be analyzed and either approved or rejected as part of this process.

d.  EEFs (4.5 Perform Integrated Change Control)

  • Project management information system (Microsoft Project, Primavera, etc.)

e.  OPAs

The OPAs that are inputs of the process 4.5 Perform Integrated Change Control include:

  • Change control procedures
  • Procedures for approving and issuing change authorizations
  • Process measurement database (measurement data on processes and products)
  • Project documents (performance baselines, project calendars, project schedule network diagrams, risk registers, planned risk response actions, and defined risk impacts)

The OPAs that are inputs of the process 4.6 Close Project or Phase include:

  • Project or phase closure guidelines or requirements
  • Historical information and lessons learned knowledge base

f.  Accepted deliverables (4. Close Project or Phase)

The documentation for accepted deliverables may include such items as

  • approved product specifications
  • delivery receipts
  • work performance documents

That covers the inputs and outputs for the last two processes of the Integration Management Knowledge Area.  The next post will start the same coverage of the inputs and outputs of the next chapter of the 5th Edition of the PMBOK Guide, Scope Management.

5th Edition PMBOK® Guide–Step 6: Memorizing Inputs & Outputs (Integration Management Part 2)


1. Introduction

In this next series of posts on memorizing the processes, we move on to the final step 6, which is memorizing the INPUTS & OUTPUTS associated with each of the 47 processes.   In order to breakdown the memorization into more bite-size chunks, I am breaking down the processes in the 10 knowledge areas into 2 or 3 posts each.

2.  Review of Processes, Tools & Techniques in Integration Knowledge Area

Process Name Tools & Techniques Inputs Outputs
4.3 Direct and Manage Project Work 1. Expert judgment

2. Project management information system

3. Meetings

 

1.  Project management plan

2.  Approved change requests

3.  EEFs

4.  OPAs

1. Deliverables

2. Work performance data

3.  Change requests

4.  Project management plan updates

5.  Project documents updates

4.4 Monitor and Control Project Work 1. Expert judgment

2. Analytical techniques

3. Project management information system

4. Meetings

1.  Project charter

2.  Schedule forecasts

3.  Cost forecasts

4.  Validated changes

5.  Work performance information

6.  EEFs

7.  OPAs

1.  Change requests

2.  Work performance reports

3.  Project management plan updates

4.  Project documents updates

3.  Outputs of Integration Knowledge Area (for processes 4.3 and 4.4)

a.  Deliverables (4.3 Direct and Manage Project Work)

The definition of a deliverable varies slightly from the 4th edition:  a deliverable is a unique and verifiable product, result or capability to perform a service that is required to complete a process, phase, or project.   The “verifiable” part is a new important part of the definition, because being able to measure success by comparing it to predetermined objective standards is key to being able to say to the organization that you actually have achieved it.   In the 4th edition, the deliverable was described as a “unique product, result or service”, but now “service” has been replaced with the most accurate “capability to perform a service”.   But this is more of a semantic change than anything of substance.

Now, in a Six Sigma project, rather than the deliverable being a unique product, the deliverable can be an improvement upon an existing process that in turn delivers a higher quality product (i.e., fewer defects).   (Although this expanded definition of a project that includes Six Sigma Projects is not to be found in the glossary definition of “project” in the 5th Edition, it is included in the 1st chapter of the 5th Edition of the PMBOK® Guide.)

However, the “verifiable” part of the definition is also crucial to Six Sigma projects, because if you can’t prove that the improvement to the existing process actually results in fewer defects, than it cannot be considered a success.   You may have to go back to the proverbial drawing board and come up with the correct root cause and come up with a new process to improve that will correct that.

One last clarification on deliverables:   although the output of the process is a “verifiable product”, is the verifying done as part of the process 4.3 Direct and Manage Project Work?   No!   The verifying of the deliverable takes place in the process 8.3 Control Quality, a Quality Knowledge Area process.    Once the deliverable is verified internally within the organization, it then goes over to the customer for them to validate it in the process 5.5 Validate Scope, a Scope Knowledge Area process.   As mentioned before, many times the output of one process goes to the input of the next process in sequence within the knowledge area.   For example, the Project Management Plan, the output of the process 4.2 Develop Project Management Plan, is an input to the next process in the sequence, 4.3 Direct and Manage Project Work.    Where you have to be careful is where the outputs to a process skip over to some other knowledge area, and this is what happens in the case of deliverables.

b.  Work Performance Data (4.3 Direct and Manage Project Work)

These are raw observations and measurements that are identified while the activities are being carried out to complete the project work.    Examples of these are:

  • Percentage work completed
  • Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
  • Start and Finish Dates of Schedule Activities
  • Actual Costs
  • Actual Durations

They are the raw material from which work performance information is derived, which is knowledge that is deemed useful to stakeholders in informing them how the project is going, and is included in the output of the next process.

c.   Work Performance Reports (4.4 Monitor and Control Project Work)

These reports include such things as status reports, memos, updates, and possibly recommendations based on work performance information (such as the results of earned value measurement calculations).

d.   Change Requests (4.3 Direct and Manage Project Work, 4.4 Monitor and Control Project Work)

You may notice a variation between the work actually being done and what is in the project management plan either

a) while the work is being done, i.e., during the execution process, in which case they are an output of the process 4.3 Direct and Manage Project Work, or

b) during a scheduled milestone where you analyze where you are on the project, i.e., during the monitor & control process, in which case they are an output of the process 4.4 Monitor and Control Project Work.

You may decide that you need to either a) change the work to fit the plan or, if it turns out the plan wasn’t realistic, you may change the plan to fit the work.   In either case, this will require you to make a proposed change or a change request.

The change request will be one of three types.   Think of the story of the Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens, where Ebeneezer Scrooge was visited by three ghosts, the Ghost of Christmas Past, the Ghost of Christmas Present, and the Ghost of Christmas Future.   In an analogous way, a project manager is haunted by three ghosts on a project:

  • the Ghost of Defects Past, which are remedied through defect repair;
  • the Ghost of Defects Present, which are remedied through corrective action;
  • the Ghost of Defects Future, which are remedied through preventive action.

The output of these proposed changes or change requests, whether they occur as an output to 4.3 Direct and Manage Project Work or 4.4 Monitor and Control Project Work, are sent over as inputs to 4.5 Perform Integrated Change Control, where they are analyzed and either approved or rejected.

e.   Project Management Plan Updates (4.3 Direct and Manage Project Work, 4.4 Monitor and Control Project Work)

Together with any change requests, there will be updates to the project management plan, especially if the change is to make the plan more realistic so that it conforms more to the work as it is actually being done.    Remember that the project management plan is not really a single plan, but a conglomeration of the following baselines and plans:

  • the three performance baselines related to scope, time and cost
  • nine management plans covering all of the other knowledge areas
  • four additional subsidiary management plans (change, configuration, process improvement, and requirements management)

f.   Project Document Updates (4.3 Direct and Manage Project Work, 4.4 Monitor and Control Project Work)

Some of the project documents that may be updated together with these two processes are:

  • schedule and cost forecasts (will the deadline be met, and will the project come in under budget if things keep going as they are?)
  • work performance reports (updates to the output listed in paragraph c above)
  • issue logs (to note issues that team members bring to the attention of the project manager as the project goes forward)

4.  Inputs of Integration Knowledge Area (for processes 4.5 and 4.6)

The outputs are usually easier to recognize because once you understand what the process does, it is usually relatively easy to figure out what the output of that process will be.    The project management plan is, for example, the output of the process 4.2 Develop Project Management Plan.   Going in the other direction is somewhat more difficult.   If I showed you a picture of a bunch of ingredients on a kitchen table, you might be able to guess at what the dish is I’m going to make.   But if I ask you to taste the dish, you would have to be a pretty experienced chef to answer me if I ask you,”what are all the ingredients that went into it?”.   So let’s get cooking!

In the case of this knowledge area of Integration, the inputs are relatively straightforward, and the exceptions are noteworthy.   When I say “straightforward”, I mean specifically that they are often times the outputs of the previous process in the sequence.    But when they come from somewhere else in the process matrix, it is important to note these “exceptions” because they are usually significant (like where the “change requests” go to and what happens to them if they get approved–or rejected).

a) Project Management Plan (4.3 Direct and Manage Project Work)

This is one of the regular inputs, that is, it is the output of the previous process in the sequence, 4.2 Develop Project Management Plan.    In simple language, in this process you work the plan, after having planned the work in the previous one.

b) Approved change requests (4.3 Direct and Manage Project Work)

Okay, up in the section on Outputs, I mentioned that, if you see the need for changes in the work or the plan, the proposed changes or change requests may be an output of either 4.3 Direct and Manage Project Work or 4.4 Monitor & Control Project Work).   In either case, they go to the process which is designed for one purpose and one purpose only, namely, to analyze those changes and decide whether or not to implement them.   If they get rejected, then the rejected change requests gets recorded in the change management plan, together with the details of why it was rejected, for future reference.    But if it is approved, then the approved change request gets fed as an input to this process, 4.3 Direct and Manage Project work, so that it can be implemented as part of the process.

c)  Schedule Forecasts, d) Cost Forecasts (4.4 Monitor & Control Project Work)

This takes the schedule and cost variance information from earned value management, expressed either in terms of SV and CV or SPI or CPI, respectively, and compares it to the Estimate at Completion or EAC.    This tells the project manager whether, according to the work as it is being done now, will result in the project coming in under budget and by the deadline date.

e)  Validated Changes (4.4 Monitor & Control Project Work)

Okay, remember the “approved change requests” that went into 4.3 Direct and Manage Project Work to be implemented.    They need to be validated to make sure that they are implemented correctly in the process 8.3 Control Quality.   Then the output of that process, validated changes, are then input into 4.4 Monitor & Control Project Work.

NOTE:   PMI employs some confusing terminology when it comes to the difference between validating and verifying.  When it comes to deliverables, verifying deliverables means internally (i.e., within the organization) verifying to see whether they meet the scope and quality criteria set forth in those respective management plans as part of the overall Project Management Plan.    Then they are sent over to the customer who validates the deliverables.

In the 4th Edition, these terms were switched around to meet the exactly opposite.   To make things worse, when it comes to managing changes to the project as opposed to the deliverables, PMI calls that internal process (again, meaning within the organization as opposed to by the customer or sponsor) validating changes.

I suppose one way to sort this out is by saying that only the organization doing the project can validate whether the changes in the project were implemented or not, but the customer does have a say in whether the end product, the deliverables, meets the customer requirements.   So in the case of deliverables, as opposed to changes in the project, there is a need to distinguish between internal verification and external validation.   But how should you keep these terms straight?    Here’s a memory tip I thought of a while back.   When you go to an office building that has a parking garage, you get a parking ticket so that you can pay on the way out of the garage.    When it is time to leave your appointment at whatever office you go to, what are the steps you go to on the way to your car?    The customer you are visiting validates your parking, and then you yourself must verify by memory (or by a written note on the parking ticket, which is what I always do) where your car actually is in the garage.    This may help you remember that the customer does the validation of the deliverables, whereas your organization does the verification.

f)  Work Performance Information (4.4 Monitor & Control Project Work)

One of the outputs from 4.3 Direct and Manage Project Work is Work Performance Data, the raw data regarding the scope, cost and schedule which, once analyzed through Earned Value Measurement, gets turns into Work Performance Information.   This is an input into this process of 4.4 Monitor & Control Project Work.    Examples of this are:

  • status of deliverables
  • implementation status for change requests
  • forecasted estimates to complete

Then after this process is complete, the output is Work Performance Reports, which are the Work Performance Information turned into reports which the stakeholders can receive and from which they can understand the status of the project.

 

g)  EEFs (4.3 Direct and Manage Project Work, 4.4 Monitor & Control Project Work)

To do the work in 4.3 Direct and Manage Project Work, you need

  • Organizational or company culture
  • Infrastructure (facilities, equipment)
  • Personnel administration
  • Stakeholder risk tolerances (e.g., allowable cost overrun percentage)
  • Project management information system (Microsoft Project, Primavera)

To monitor & control the project work in 4.4 Monitor & Control Project Work, you need

  • Government or industry standards
  • Organization work authorization systems
  • Stakeholder risk tolerances
  • Project management information system (Microsoft Project, Primavera)

h)  OPAs (4.3 Direct and Manage Project Work, 4.4 Monitor & Control Project Work)

To do the project work in 4.3 Direct and Manage Project Work, you need

  • Standardized guidelines, work instructions
  • Communication requirements (including record retention guidelines, security requirements)
  • Issue and defect management procedures (issue and defect controls, issue and defect identification and resolution, action item tracking) and databases (containing historical information from previous processes)
  • Process measurement database (measurement data on processes and products)
  • Project files from previous projects (performance baselines, risk registers, lessons learned documentation)

To monitor & control the project work in 4.4 Monitor & Control Project Work, you need

  • Communication requirements
  • Financial controls procedures (time reporting, expenditure and disbursement reviews, accounting codes, standard contract provisions)
  • Issue and defect management procedures (issue and defect controls, issue and defect identification and resolution, action item tracking)
  • Change control procedures (including those dealing with scope, schedule, cost, and quality variances)
  • Risk control procedures (risk categories, probability and impact matrix)
  • Process measurement database (measurement data on processes and products)
  • Project files from previous projects (lessons learned documentation)

Don’t try to memorize inputs or outputs!   Rather, get a stack of index cards and write the names of inputs and outputs on them.    Then take sheets of paper that represent the six processes in the Integration Knowledge Area.   After shuffling the index cards, read each input or output and put it on the process you think it goes with.   You’ll be surprised how many you’ll guess right the first time, IF you take the time to understand what the process DOES and what TOOLS & TECHNIQUES it uses.

The next post covers the last two processes in this knowledge area, 4.5 Perform Integrated Change Control and 4.6 Close Phase or Project.